
Grandmaster
Keith R. Kernspecht |
How we are
able to know when the opponent will attack
The
warning brain impulses
In
1965 two German neurologists discovered that certain brain
impulses are detectable in humans between one half and one
second before we start to carry out a simple action of our
own volition (such as crooking a finger). |
This delay between
readiness for action and the action itself seemed to be pretty
long to an American professor in the field of brain research, so
he resolved to find out when a person becomes aware that he
wants to carry out such a deliberate action.
How he conducted his
experiments can be ignored for our purposes, but at any rate he
discovered that we humans only become aware of the existence of
such an intention approx. 0.2 seconds before we carry out the
action. In other words, it is only after 0.3 seconds have passed
that we humans become aware that we have decided to perform an
action.
This means that the decision to carry out a deliberate action
takes place without our knowledge, and that the action itself
begins unconsciously!
That said, our brain deceives us by pretending that we have only
consciously made this 0.3-second old decision just now. Our
consciousness therefore deceives us at every turn!
Of what use are these research results to us for our
BlitzDefence situation in ritualised combat?
It is no doubt interesting to know that the intention to carry
out a deliberate action is already detectable in the brain as
readiness for action 1 second or at least 0.5 seconds (in the
case of simple actions) beforehand. In practice, however, it is
hardly possible for us to attach electrodes to the head of a
furious adversary in a bar in order to produce several
electro-encephalograms (EEGs), measure the changes in the
electrical field and find out whether these represent an advance
warning.
Tell-tale body language
It is only 0.2 seconds before the action that the attacker knows
he intends to strike a blow. But his brain and his body already
know this 0.3 seconds beforehand.
While the attacker is still completely oblivious, his body has
already marshalled its forces: hormones are sent to their action
stations, the guns are run out, shells are loaded into the
breech and everything is ready for the command to fire. The
engines are running at full power and the muscles are already
preparing themselves for the recoil.
The future attacker is still unaware of this, but the
defender knows more about him than he does himself.
The millions of bits of information which have not yet reached
his consciousness, and are not accessible to him, can be read by
the defender with a little experience. They are an open secret
for somebody who understands body language, has the necessary
experience and trusts his own intuition.
Somebody who is ready for action himself, responds to the
tell-tale signs given by the body and is not paralysed with fear
now has more than a good chance of being faster than the
attacker. Before the attacker himself, or at least at the same
time, he can be aware that an attack is imminent.
From signals received diagonally via the left eye, and without
us knowing what these are, the right (non-verbal) side of the
brain recognises the attack preparations of the other party.
Since we re-act with a practiced, pre-programmed WingTsun
counter-attack, it is safe to assume that we are capable of the
minimum reaction time of 0.1 seconds. If we take another 0.1
seconds for the counter-attack, this produces a total time of
0.2 seconds.
The attacker has no reaction time, however he has a preparation
time of 0.5 seconds which cannot be shortened. If we add an
attack time of 0.1 seconds to this, the result for him is a
total time of 0.6 seconds.
recognise their readiness for action at approx. minus 0.2
seconds, and strike them just as they become aware of their
intention to launch an attack.
Even if the defender only recognises the “readiness for action“
at minus 0.1 and immediately counters the opponent’s attack as
it starts at 0.0 seconds, his reaction will be simultaneous with
the action of the attacker.
Thanks to the superior attacking positions and angles of the WT
punch, the BlitzDefence user will control the arm of the
opponent and land his own blow.
The re-action is always faster than the action!
Again and again I hear or read about sometimes highly graded
masters, including those of related styles, who assert that the
action is faster than the reaction and that we should be
proactive fighters who actively control and initiate the
encounter. I myself only recognised the truth after decades of
research and experimentation.
These people only start counting the time from the start of the
opponent’s movement, and consider the attacker to be in a
superior position because he needs no reaction time. But in fact
the attacker is slowed down by a preparation time which is five
times as long in our case. If the defender unconsciously
registers the readiness for action with the right side of the
brain, he can easily beat the proactive attacker to the punch
with his reaction. But since the right side of the brain feels
the effects of alcohol more quickly than the left side in the
opinion of some scientists, it is better to remain abstinent
during an evening out if you expect or tend to attract trouble
...
It is actually very sensible for Nature to have designed the
reaction to be faster than the action. While the individual who
wishes to carry out an action first plans, puts himself in a
favourable position, “calculates“ how he can absorb the power of
the impact with his arm and with his stance, and thinks ahead
about the consequences of his action, the defender as the
reactor may not and must not have these thoughts. While the
attacker needs to arrive at a decision, the defender only needs
a semi-reflexive, conditioned reaction with minimal preparation
time, like a reptile lashing out with its tail.
In the really purely theoretical case that our defender detects
the start of the preparation to attack at minus 0.5 seconds (the
readiness for action), he would be able to deliver a punch to
the attacker’s head 0.1 seconds before the latter is even
conscious that he intends to attack. Perhaps this explains why
some would-be bullies stammer “But I wasn’t going to do anything“
after they have been beaten to the punch. During the course of
my experiments, my “opponents“ report that I often strike them
just when they have realised that they intend to attack,
therefore I feel able to assume that in many cases I already
“subconsciously“
detect their readiness for action at approx. minus 0.2 seconds,
and strike them just as they become aware of their intention to
launch an attack.
Even if the defender only recognises the “readiness for action“
at minus 0.1 and immediately counters the opponent’s attack as
it starts at 0.0 seconds, his reaction will be simultaneous with
the action of the attacker.
Thanks to the superior attacking positions and angles of the WT
punch, the BlitzDefence user will control the arm of the
opponent and land his own blow.
Why the fair hero wins so often in Westerns
No lesser man that the scientist Niels Bohr came to a similar
conclusion when considering whether the makers of romantic
Western films were right to let the fair-and-square hero dressed
in white win the gunfight. He sent his students out to buy toy
revolvers and holsters, then beat one after the other in a mock
“gunfight“ to show them that the fair man who lets his opponent
draw first must emerge the winner*. This is not despite waiting,
but because he lets the other reach for his shooting iron first.
The baddie must decide when to draw, therefore he needs more
time than the goodie. Our hero reacts to the opponent’s draw
with a conditioned reflex action, for which he needs far less
time than the baddie. No particular decisions (bits) are
required, as the opponent’s attack does not need to be
identified more closely and the reaction is to draw and shoot at
the centre of the opponent’s body, something which he has
previously practiced thousands of times.
Freedom of will and the right of veto
The brain appears to make its decisions in secret and without
our awareness, and then has the courtesy to inform us about them
with a delay.
As advantageous as this delay in consciousness is for us as the
defenders in a ritualised encounter or in a Western-style
gunfight situation, the more mixed are my feelings where the
associated concept of freedom of will is concerned. Are those
people right who assert that “man is not capable of action(s)?
This raises legal problems, for how can we punish somebody for
something which he has not himself decided to do? How can the
average person follow what is allowed by the commandments in the
New Testament if he is only able to obey what is forbidden by
exercising his right of veto? It is at least some consolation
that we have 0.2 seconds or so to abort the decision
unconsciously taken for us (for whom?) by the brain(?), once we
have become aware of it.
In other words, we have a right of veto for 0.2 seconds. Reason
enough to live very consciously, continuously examine our
innermost selves and e.g. practice the Siu-Nim-Tau in
slow-motion. Only by performing exercises in slow-motion can we
pay enough attention to make good use of the three tenths of a
second that make the difference between a machine and a human
being.
In our daily lives we should always try to make a conscious
decision before we initiate any action, whether it be reaching
for a glass or putting the door key in our pocket. Recognising
our present condition and wanting to change it, so that we raise
ourselves above the status of man as a machine, overcome the
robot within ourselves and take responsibility and control over
ourselves, should be the most important objective of every
individual!
 |